Comparison
HireAll Boost vs Metaview: price, speed and results (November 2026)
Prices and facts checked 2 November 2026
- PriceTie
- To first interviewsTie
- Your timeBoost
- Who you reachMetaview
- Fake-CV riskTie
- ContractBoost
No card. 1 credit = one candidate who gets an invite.
In short: Metaview sells recruiters Sourcing at $100–300 a month per user, and fillmore for a fee per hire it doesn't publish. Boost sells a hiring manager credits: $0.40–0.50 per person invited, 100 free, everything after the invite included.
At a glance
Boost and Metaview, row by row
| HireAll Boostwins 2 of 6 | MetaviewSourcing agent · fillmore | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Tie$0.50 a profile on Pro, $0.50 an invite$0.40–0.50 per invite, 100 free. ≈ $14–17 per interview estimate | TieSourcing: $100 or $300 a month per user. fillmore: paid only when you hire, fee not published1,3 |
| To first interviews | Tieboth count in days~3–7 days, by pace estimate | Tiefillmore: "meet candidates within days"1 |
| Your time | ✓ Boost winswritten answers instead of a screening call to run10 minutes to brief, then approve or skip | fillmore: a brief and one-tap approvals in Slack, then the screening calls1 |
| Who you reach | Passive: people who aren't applying | ✓ Metaview winsemail, LinkedIn and WhatsApp; applicants tooPassive, by email, LinkedIn and WhatsApp; applicants too1,2 |
| Fake-CV risk | Tieboth outbound, both check firstLow only people who said yes and filled in your questionnaire | TieLow outbound: it picks whom to contact |
| Contract | ✓ Boost winsno subscription, price on the pageNone: prepaid credits that don't expire | Sourcing: per user a month. fillmore: per hire1,3 |
Prices as of November 2026, from each vendor's public pages, or a published estimate where the vendor quotes privately. Product names belong to their owners; HireAll is not affiliated with them.
Price
What one role costs for a month
One open role for one month. Metaview prices its Sourcing agent per user per month, on a public page: free for the first 100 profiles, Pro at $100 for 200 profiles a month, Max at $300 for unlimited profiles, and Enterprise by quote.3 fillmore is priced another way: you "only pay when you hire", and its page gives no fee, only a demo.1 Boost's price is the pace you pick.
Sourcing "curates a high-fit shortlist and handles outreach tuned to your tone";4 fillmore also books screening calls with the people who are interested. Booking is what Boost sells too, so fillmore is the closer match.
HireAll Boost
Pick a pace: people invited a day
- Invites this month
- 600
- At $0.50 a credit
- $300
- With the 2,000-credit pack
- $240
- Interested people estimate
- ≈ 61
- First interviews estimate
- ~5 days
About $17 an interview estimate, $14 with the biggest pack. The first 100 credits are free.
Metaview
Sourcing agent · fillmore
- Sourcing Free
- $0: the first 100 profiles sourced
- Sourcing Pro
- $100 a month per user, 200 profiles
- Per profile on Pro
- $0.50
- Sourcing Max
- $300 a month per user, unlimited profiles
- fillmore
- Nothing until you hire; the fee per hire isn't published
- Notetaker, if you want it
- $60 a month per user, or free for 25 calls5
Interviews: Sourcing finds people and writes to them; fillmore also books the screening calls, and bills when you hire.
Pro comes to $0.50 a profile, the same as a Boost invite at list price ($0.40 in the biggest pack). But a profile sourced is a person found, and a Boost credit is a person invited, with the intro, follow-ups, questionnaire and booking included. At volume Max costs less: past 600–750 invites a month, Boost costs more per person than unlimited profiles for $300. One role at the Fast pace comes out even: 600 invites cost $300.
Boost costs less in the gaps: one or two roles a year, and the months between them, when a monthly plan bills until you cancel it and Boost's credits wait. fillmore has a real strength of its own: no hire, no bill. What it doesn't give you is the number. For scale, a contingency agency charges about 20–25% of first-year pay;6 Metaview doesn't say where fillmore's fee sits. With Boost you can work out an interview, about $17 estimate, before you spend anything.
estimate Boost's figures come from its product model, until the pilot reports: 2.9% of the people invited book an interview, and 10.1% say they're interested. A month here is 30 days.
Speed and effort
What you do with each, step by step
Where the hours go, from an open role to the first call. The right column is fillmore, Metaview's closest match to Boost: both take a brief and book calls.
| With Boost | With Metaview | |
|---|---|---|
| Say who you want | Describe the role in a chat or paste the job description. Boost turns it into must-haves, filters, a questionnaire and the LinkedIn messages, which you can edit. | Brief fillmore in Slack with a job description or example profiles; Metaview calls it a 7-minute setup.1 |
| Find the people | Reads every matching profile in full and checks each one against your must-haves. | fillmore "maps the market" and researches each candidate.1 In its case study, 23 of 52 were ruled out before any outreach.7 |
| First message | HireAll recruiters send a plain LinkedIn invite, then your intro once they accept. You see and edit the wording before it starts. | Each message written for one person, by email, LinkedIn or WhatsApp; fillmore picks the channel.1 |
| Follow up | At most two short follow-ups, sent for you. | fillmore writes and sends the follow-ups; in its case study, under the client's rules, without an approval step.7 |
| Screen | Everyone who says yes gets your two-minute questionnaire. You read the answers first. | fillmore books a screening call, and your recruiter runs it: "your job starts at the screen".1 |
| Book the call | They pick a free slot in your Google Calendar. In Manual mode you approve each person before the invite and again before the interview. | Interested candidates "land straight on your calendar"; you approve each meeting in one tap in Slack.1 |
Both count in days. fillmore promises you'll "meet candidates within days",1 and in its published case study the first call was booked on day 4 and an offer accepted on day 30.7 Boost's first interviews come in about 3 to 7 days, by pace estimate. The call differs: fillmore books a screening call your recruiter runs; Boost books an interview with someone whose answers you've read.
Quality
Whom you meet, and how they're checked
Passive and active candidates
Both go after people who aren't applying, which a job post can't: posts now draw about 291 applications per hire, against roughly 100 in early 2021.8 fillmore reaches them by email, LinkedIn and WhatsApp, picking the channel each person is likeliest to answer on.1 Boost writes on LinkedIn only. Metaview also covers applicants: its agents review applications and run screening conversations,2 for roles where 50+ people apply per opening.9 Boost doesn't post jobs or sort applicants.
Checked on substance, not keywords
Both read people against a brief rather than match keywords. Metaview builds an Ideal Candidate Profile from your job description, refines it with your decisions and gives a reason for each recommendation.3 In fillmore's case study each of 52 candidates got a research dossier, and gaps went down as questions for the first call rather than reasons to pass.7 Boost reads every matching profile in full against your must-haves and shows you why each one fits. In Manual mode you approve each person twice, and your "no, because…" teaches it whom to skip.
Fake CVs
Fake candidates get in through applications. Gartner expects one candidate profile in four worldwide to be fake by 2028;10 34% of recruiters already spend up to half their week filtering spam applications;11 and a single North Korean remote IT worker scheme reached more than 70 US employers.12 Outbound keeps the risk low for both, since they choose whom to contact. For applicants, Metaview's screening agent flags answers that are likely AI-assisted or fraudulent with a High, Medium or Low risk score.9 With Boost you meet only people who said yes and filled in your questionnaire, so you've read their answers before any call.
Which one
When Boost wins, and when Metaview still makes sense
Choose Boost when
- You're a founder or a hiring manager, not a recruiting team, and there's no Slack workspace or ATS to connect. Boost needs a brief and a Google Calendar.
- You want the price before you start: $0.40–0.50 an invite and about $14–17 an interview estimate, instead of a fee per hire you learn in a demo.
- You hire one or two roles a year: nothing billed between them, credits that don't expire and a pace you can pause.
- You'd rather keep your own mailbox and LinkedIn account out of cold outreach. HireAll recruiters write, on behalf of your company.
- You want written answers before the first call, and to start today: 100 free credits, no card, no demo.
Metaview still makes sense when
- You run a recruiting team and want one platform: Metaview's agents source, review applications, run screening conversations and take interview notes,2 and it integrates with Ashby, Greenhouse, Lever, SmartRecruiters and other ATSs.3
- Your interviewers need notes. Metaview started there:2 its Notetaker covers Zoom, Meet, Teams, Webex and phone interviews and posts notes and scorecards to your ATS.5 Boost takes no notes.
- You'd rather pay only when someone is hired, you already work in Slack and an ATS (fillmore's two requirements), and a demo to learn the fee is fine.1
- You want outreach by email and WhatsApp as well as LinkedIn, each message written for one person.1 Boost writes only on LinkedIn.
- You source all year at volume. Max covers unlimited profiles for $300 a month per user,3 less per person than Boost past 600 invites a month.
Using both
Boost alongside Metaview
Keep Metaview's Notetaker for the interviews. Boost books the interview and stops there: it takes no notes and has no ATS. The Notetaker records the call and fills the scorecard in your ATS, and its free plan covers 25 calls per user a month.5
Give Boost the roles your recruiters can't get to. A hiring manager briefs it in about 10 minutes while fillmore or Sourcing runs other roles. The people Boost books go into your ATS by hand.
Don't write to the same person twice. fillmore checks your ATS for earlier contact before it writes;7 Boost can't see your ATS. Run each role on one of them, or split the market between them, so nobody gets two messages about one job.
FAQ
Metaview vs Boost: questions people ask
How much does Metaview cost in 2026?
Sourcing is free for the first 100 profiles, then Pro at $100 a month per user for 200 profiles, or Max at $300 for unlimited profiles; Enterprise is quoted.3 The Notetaker is free for 25 calls a month, or $60 a month per user for unlimited calls.5 fillmore is paid only when you hire, and its fee isn't published.1
What is Metaview fillmore?
An autonomous recruiting agent that "finds candidates, runs personalized outreach, and books screening calls". It lives in Slack, writes by email, LinkedIn and WhatsApp, and asks you to approve each meeting.1 Metaview announced it as available on 30 September 2026.2
How much does fillmore cost?
Its page says "only pay when you hire" and gives no fee; it asks for a work email to book a demo.1 For scale, a contingency agency charges about 20–25% of first-year pay.6 Boost charges $0.40–0.50 per person invited, with 100 credits free.
What is a good Metaview alternative for a hiring manager?
If you have a role to fill and no recruiting team, HireAll Boost: it searches, invites on LinkedIn, follows up, collects your questionnaire and books the interview, with no Slack, ATS or subscription. A recruiting team that also wants interview notes and ATS sync is who Metaview is built for.
Who sends the outreach?
With Boost, HireAll recruiters write on behalf of your company; you don't connect a LinkedIn account and nobody logs in as you. fillmore's page doesn't say whose mailbox or LinkedIn account sends; its FAQ mentions "intelligent sender selection".1 Its case study describes outreach "in the recruiter's own voice" and a check for invitations "from the recruiter's LinkedIn".7
More comparisons
Stop sifting. Start hunting.
Describe the role, pick a pace and meet the first people who said yes.
Get 100 free credits →No card. 1 credit = one candidate who gets an invite.
Sources
- Metaview, fillmore: "finds candidates, runs personalized outreach, and books screening calls completely autonomously"; "share a job description or example profiles"; it "maps the market and deep researches every prospective candidate"; "interested candidates land straight on your calendar – you approve each meeting in one tap, right in slack"; "7-minute setup", "meet candidates within days", "only pay when you hire"; outreach "across email, linkedin, and whatsapp", with "intelligent sender selection"; "lives entirely in slack"; "fillmore owns the entire top of funnel so your job starts at the screen"; requirements: "you use Slack, an ATS, and are actively hiring". No fee given; the page offers a demo. Checked 2 November 2026
- Metaview, We raised an additional $60M to lead the shift to Agentic Recruiting, 30 September 2026: Metaview "has evolved from capturing interviews into an end-to-end Agentic Recruiting Platform" whose agents "source candidates, review applications, conduct structured screening conversations"; "fillmore is now available". Checked 2 November 2026
- Metaview, Pricing: Sourcing: Free, "First 100 profiles sourced free"; Pro "$100 monthly per user", "200 profiles sourced per month"; Max "$300 monthly per user", "Unlimited profiles sourced"; Enterprise "Tailored pricing". FAQ: integrates with "Ashby, Greenhouse, Lever, Gem, and SmartRecruiters"; "builds an Ideal Candidate Profile (ICP) from your job description". fillmore isn't listed. Checked 2 November 2026
- Metaview, The Agentic Recruiting Platform: the sourcing agent "curates a high-fit shortlist and handles outreach tuned to your tone"; "One shared workspace" for recruiters, hiring managers and AI agents. Checked 2 November 2026
- Metaview, AI Interview Notes: for Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, Webex and phone interviews; notes and scorecards "post to the candidate's record automatically"; free for "25 calls per user each month"; "Pro is $60 per user per month with unlimited calls". Checked 2 November 2026
- SHRM, How to Work Effectively with an Executive Search Firm, 18 July 2016: contingency recruiters "usually earn a fee in the area of 20 percent to 25 percent of the role's first-year cash compensation"; a retained search's standard fee "is about 33 percent of the role's annual salary, bonus and signing bonus". Checked 2 November 2026
- Metaview (fillmore), Case study: senior manager, demand generation: "52 candidates researched individually, 29 contacted in the recruiter's own voice, 5 calls booked"; first call booked on day 4, offer accepted on day 30; checked the ATS and "no pending invitation from the recruiter's LinkedIn" before writing. Checked 2 November 2026
- Ashby, Recruiter Productivity Trends, reported by HR Dive, May 2026: "291 applications per hire, compared to roughly 100 in early 2021". Checked 1 November 2026
- Metaview, AI Screening Agent: for "high-volume roles where 50+ candidates apply per opening"; it "flags responses that are likely AI-assisted or fraudulent" with a High, Medium or Low risk score. Checked 2 November 2026
- Gartner, press release, 31 July 2025: "by 2028, one in four candidate profiles worldwide will be fake". A forecast. In its surveys 6% of candidates admitted to interview fraud, "either posing as someone else or having someone else pose as them"; 39% used AI while applying, 54% of those to write resume text; 62% are more likely to apply where interviews are in person. Checked 2 November 2026
- Greenhouse, press release, 19 November 2025: 34% of recruiters spend up to half their week filtering spam and junk applications. In the US, 91% of recruiters have spotted candidate deception; 65% of hiring managers caught applicants using AI deceptively: reading AI-generated scripts 32%, prompt injections in resumes 22%, deepfakes 18%; 36% of job seekers altered their appearance, voice or background in video interviews. Survey of 4,136 people in the US, UK, Ireland and Germany. Checked 2 November 2026
- US Department of Justice, press release, 13 October 2026: one of the North Korean remote IT worker schemes charged "impacted more than 70 U.S. company employers". Checked 1 November 2026